Petitioners sought relief in a criminal writ petition; the court noted a chargesheet was already filed and petitioners had an alternate statutory remedy under the Cr.P.C. before the trial Court. The petition was disposed of with that remedy reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Osk 15-Wp-3334-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3334 OF 2024
Bharti Ganpat Kokate & Ors.
… Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Ashwin Kapadnis a/w. Mr. Prashant Kadam for Petitioners. Ms. Anamika Malhotra, Addl. P.P. for Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Komal Sinha for Respondent No.2. P.S.I. Mr. S.L. Doke, Borivali Police Station, Mumbai, present.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 22nd August 2024.
P.C. :
having alternate statutory remedy under the provisions of Cr.P.C. before the trial Court.
( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
Digitally signed by OMKAR OMKAR SHIVAHAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN KUMBHAKARN Date: 2024.08.23 19:02:46 +0530
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable when an alternate statutory remedy exists before the trial Court after filing of chargesheet.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bharti Ganpat Kokate & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
A. S. Gadkari
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
