Petitioner challenged a Look-Out Circular issued against him by the CBI. The CBI stated the circular was cancelled pursuant to a letter from its Deputy Inspector General, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Gitalaxmi 43-wp-3290-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3290 OF 2024
Anilkumar Babulal Runthala …..Petitioner
Vs.
Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. …..Respondents
Mr. Ashish Shukla a/w Mr. Prachish Shukla for the Petitioner. Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Amit Munde, S.P.P. a/w Mr. Jai Vohra for Respondent No. 1-C.B.I. A.C.B., Pune.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2024.
P.C.:-
submitted that, in pursuance of the letter dated 4th July 2024 issued by the
Deputy Inspector General of Police, C.B.I. A.C.B., Pune, the Look-Out Circular issued against the Petitioner has been cancelled.
1.1) In view thereof, Petition is worked out and nothing further survives in the Petition.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by GITALAXMI GITALAXMI KRISHNA KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2024.09.04 17:56:30 +0530
1/1
Anilkumar Babulal Runthala
Central Bureau of Investigation
A. S. Gadkari
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
