Dismissed

Mayur Ravikumar Modi v. Union of India Th. Ministry of Law and Justice/Mea

Bombay HC4 Jul 2024WP/3117/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging revocation of the petitioner's passport was not pressed because the appellate order dated 22 June 2024 had been passed; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge that appellate order.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the order dated 22 June 2024 upholding revocation of the passport.

Mayur Ravikumar Modi vs Union of India Th. Ministry… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

3.wp.3117.2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.3117 OF 2024

¶4

Mayur Ravikumar Modi .. Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Digitally signed by UTKARSH UTKARSH KAKASAHEB KAKASAHEB BHALERAO BHALERAO Date: 2024.07.05 14:15:52 +0530

¶7

Union of India through Ministry of Law and Justice & Ors.

¶8

.. Respondents

¶9

Mr.Keegan Almeida, Advocate for the Petitioner.

¶10

Mr.D.A. Dube a/w Sachidanand Singh, Advocates for Respondents.

¶11

CORAM :B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE : JULY 04, 2024

¶12

P. C.

¶13

1. The above Writ Petition is filed seeking the following

¶14

reliefs:-

¶15

“(a) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ/Order/direction to quash and set aside the impugned letter dated 06.03.2024 [Exhibit “O” hereto] bearing Letter Ref No.IMP/326416026/24 issued by the Office of Respondent No.3.

¶16

and/or

¶17

(b) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ/Order/Direction to quash and set aside the Impugned Order dated 07.03.2024 [Exhibit “P hereto] bearing Ref:BO1075751442021 issued by the Office of Respondent No.3.

¶18

and/or

¶19

Utkarsh

¶20

Page 1 of 2 JULY 04, 2024

¶21

3.wp.3117.2024.doc

¶22

(c) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents not to revoke/impound the renewed passport bearing no.V3962179 of the Petitioner to enable him unhindered travel abroad for the purposes of admission of his daughter and/or for other purposes. and/or

¶23

(d) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue any order or direction directing the Respondent No.2 to expeditiously decide the Appeal preferred by the Petitioner on 01.04.2024 before the Respondent No.2 (Chief Passport Officer, Passport Division, Ministry of External Affairs).”

¶24

2. Mr.Almeida, the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that the Appeal preferred by the Petitioner before Respondent No.2 has now been decided against the Petitioner and an order is passed on 22^nd June 2024 upholding the revocation of the passport of the Petitioner. He, therefore, sought leave to withdraw the above Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the said order.

¶25

3. In these circumstances, the above Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

¶26

4. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

¶27

[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.] Page 2 of 2 JULY 04, 2024

¶28

Utkarsh

Mayur Ravikumar Modi v. Union of India Th. Ministry of Law and Justice/Mea

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mayur Ravikumar Modi v. Union of India Th. Ministry of Law and Justice/Mea

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Raj Kantilal Shah vs Sanskar Gem Pvt. Ltd.

Sukumar Bhoja Shetty vs Gunapal Bhoja Shetty

Mayur Ravikumar Modi vs Union of India Th. Ministry of Law and Justice/Mea

Exalt Alfrad Dsouza vs the Regional Passport Office and Anr.

Jaihind Oil Mills Company through Partner Rajesh Kishnani vs the Additional Collector and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Greater Mumbai

Devika Sunil Jamdar vs Serika Lal Aggarwal