Allowed

Rajaram Jainandan Yadav v. the Municipal Commissioner

Bombay HC12 Aug 2024WP/3096/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim application seeking amendment of a writ petition against the Municipal Corporation to incorporate subsequent events. The High Court allowed the amendment, directed an affidavit in reply from the Corporation, and listed the petition for admission hearing.

What did the court decide?

Amendment to the writ petition permitted to be carried out by 18 October 2024; Municipal Corporation directed to file affidavit in reply by 15 November 2024; petition listed for admission on 18 Novemb

Rajaram Jainandan Yadav vs the Municipal… — Municipal and Town Planning | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2024.10.09 10:45:41 +0530

¶2

Trupti 1 17-ia-2310-2024.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2310 OF 2024 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 3096 OF 2024

¶6

Rajaram Jainandan Yadav	… Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Rajaram Jainandan Yadav versus	… Petitioner
The Municipal Commissioner,
Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika and Others	… Respondents

¶7

Ms.Panthi Desai i/b. M.P.Vashi and Associates for the Applicant/ Petitioner.

¶8

Mr.Shivprasad Borade for the Respondent – Municipal Corporation.

¶9

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

¶10

DATE : 7^TH OCTOBER 2024

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

The Petitioner desires to amend the Petition in view of the

¶13

subsequent events. The Petition is awaiting issuance of notice.

¶14

Heard the learned Advocates.

¶15

For the reasons cited, the Interim Application is allowed.

¶16

Trupti 2 17-ia-2310-2024.odt

¶17

Amendment to the Writ Petition be carried out, on or before 18^th October, 2024. Thereafter, the Municipal Corporation, which is already before us, shall file a comprehensive affidavit in reply to the amended Writ Petition, on or before 15^th November, 2024.

¶18

List the Petition for admission hearing on 18^th November,

¶19

¶20

( M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

Rajaram Jainandan Yadav v. the Municipal Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajaram Jainandan Yadav v. the Municipal Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Asaram Kanashi Patil vs Education Inspector, North Division, Greater Mumbai and 4 Ors.

Manoj Lokhande vs Dean and Director (Me and Mh) and 5 Ors.

Mrs. Shaila Eknath Sanap vs the State of Maharashtra Thru the Secretary, Dept. of Edu. and Sports and Ors.

Shaikh Nafees Ahmed Abdul Jabbar and Ors. vs Malegaon Municipal Corporation through the Commissioner and Ors.

Beena Sugathan Nee Been K. B. vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Education Dept. and Ors.

Vijaykumari R Yaram vs the President / Secretary, Subhash Nagar Telugu Shikshan Mandal and Ors.