A writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, was heard and notice issued to the respondent with a returnable date. The petitioner may serve by private mode in addition to regular service, failing which costs are payable; office objections must be removed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 30-WP No.299.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 299 OF 20 24
(Anilkumar S/o Bhaskarrao Walokar ..VS.. Brijkishore S/o Sundarlal Bhattad)
Shri R.M. Sharma, Advocate for Petitioner.
CORAM : A NIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : JANUARY 15, 2024.
04.03.2024.
JUDGE
Kirtak. Signed by: Mr. B.J. Kirtak Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 15/01/2024 18:58:06
Anilkumar S/o Bhaskarrao Walokar
Brijkishore S/o Sundarlal Bhattad
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
