Allowed¶13
Pradeep Girdhar Patil v. Plantation Officer and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/2951/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Keywords: speaking to minutes; correction of order; inadvertent/clerical mistake; '12 to 13 years'; '15 to 20 years'; order dated 28.11.2024; paragraph no. 3; Writ Petition No. 2614 of 2003; Writ Petition No. 2951 of 2003; State of Maharashtra; Ashok Gopal Patil; Aurangabad Bench; R. M. Joshi, J. Disposition: motion allowed – order dated 28.11.2024 corrected and corrected order to be uploaded. No statutes, precedents, or quantum involved; purely ministerial correction, no substantive holdings on the merits.
What did the court decide?
Correction of the order dated 28.11.2024: paragraph no. 3 amended to read '15 to 20 years' in place of '12 to 13 years', with direction that the corrected order be uploaded. ¶13