Petitioners' counsel stated that parties settled the dispute before the Trial Court. Consequently, the High Court took the settlement order on record and dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to parties' settlement before the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:27925
977-WP-1578-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1578 OF 2024
Aijaz Ahmed Khan Mukhtar Ahmed Khan And Another
VERSUS
Sayyada Nazeen Begum Imtiyaz Ahmed Khan And Others
• Ms. A. N. Ansari, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. N. S. Muthiyan, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3CORAM:R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE:NOVEMBER 28, 2024
PER COURT :
1.Learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on
instructions, makes statement that parties have settled
the dispute before Trial Court, as such, nothing
survives in the Writ Petition. She places on record
photocopy of that order. The same is taken on record
and marked ‘X’ for identification.
2.Petition is dismissed of as infructuous.
PAGE 1 OF 1
Umesh
Aijaz Ahmed Khan
Mukhtar Ahmed Khan
Sayyada Nazeen Begum
Imtiyaz Ahmed Khan
R.M. JOHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court