Writ petition challenging an appellate court's order dismissing a restoration application, pending at pre-admission stage since 2017. With counsel repeatedly unavailable to argue across many listed dates and again absent on the hearing date, the court dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-WP-294-2018.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VASANT Digitally signed byVASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAO IDHOL IDHOL Date: 2024.01.1918:32:05 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO.2947 OF 2018
Arjun Ramnath Chari & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. Taj Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd. Through Chairman Dr. Ranvirkumar Singh ...Respondent
Mr.D.K. Shukla i/b Mr.Dilip Shukla for the Petitioners.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 18TH JANUARY, 2024.
P.C. :-
that Mr.Dilip Shukla is unable to attend this Court today.
and an Appeal against the said decree, which was dismissed for
want of prosecution. An application for restoration was filed
1/2
14-WP-294-2018.doc
before the Appellate Court without any prayer for delay condonation. The said application for restoration was dismissed by an order dated 3 May 2014. The present Writ Petition challenges the said order dated 3 May 2014.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging dismissal of a restoration application should be decided despite the petitioners' counsel's repeated inability to argue the matter.
Arjun Ramnath Chari & Anr.
Taj Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd. Through Chairman Dr. Ranvirkumar Singh
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
