Writ petition over a possession dispute settled between the parties after the respondent handed over possession. Counsel for petitioners produced an e-mail confirming non-pursuit, and the court disposed of the writ petition as settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
15 - WP 1288 OF 2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KANCHAN Digitally signedby KANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.01.2010:50:50 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1288 OF 2020
Akhil Deshastha Rigwedi Brahman Madyawarti Mandal Mumbai & Ors. ….. Petitioners
VERSUS
Sankalp Suresh Patil
….. Respondent
Mr.C.N.Chavan for the Petitioners.
Mr.J.M.D’silava for the Respondent.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 17 JANUARY, 2024
P.C. :-
Mr. Chavan, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
he has received an e-mail from his clients thereby informing him
not to pursue the matter since the respondent has handed over
possession. A copy of the e-mail dated 17 January, 2024 is taken
on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
2. Writ petition is disposed of as settled between the parties.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Akhil Deshastha Rigwedi Brahman Madyawarti Mandal Mumbai & Ors.
Sankalp Suresh Patil
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court