Writ petition sought quashing of C.R. No. 170 of 2024 registered at Ravet Police Station, Pimpri-Chinchwad. The State stated investigation concluded and a B-Summary Report would be filed within two weeks. The statement was accepted and the petition was disposed of as not surviving.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sns 41-wp-2929-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2929 OF 2024
Rohan Rajendra Bhosale And Anr.
…..Petitioners
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Rajabhau S. Chaudhari i/by Mr. Kishan S. Chaudhari, for the Petitioners.
Smt. Anamika Malhotra, Addl.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State. PSI P.T.Chate attached to Ravet Police Station present.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 9th JULY, 2024.
P.C.:-
attached to Ravet Police Station submitted that, after completing the investigation of the present crime, the Police have reached to the conclusion
that, ‘B-Summary Report’ to be filed before the Court of competent jurisdiction within a period of two weeks from today. The said statement is accepted.
(DR NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed bySHAMBHAVI SHAMBHAVI NILESH NILESH SHIVGAN SHIVGAN Date: 2024.07.16 12:03:17 +0530
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR (C.R. No. 170 of 2024) registered with Ravet Police Station should be quashed, given the police decision to file a B-Summary Report.
Rohan Rajendra Bhosale And Anr.
The State Of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 2
A. S. Gadkari
Dr Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
