Disposed

Mr. Amar S/O Gulab Deogade v. the State of Maha. Thr. Collector, Chandrapur and Others

Bombay HC2 May 2024WP/2893/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A person claiming to be a Project Affected Person with a 2017 certificate sought employment through unaddressed representations to authorities. The court disposed of the petition by directing him to appear before respondent Nos.5 and 6, who must decide his prayer for appointment in accordance with law within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with direction to appear before respondent Nos.5 and 6; prayer for appointment as Project Affected Person to be decided in accordance with law within six weeks of appearance.

Mr. Amar S/O Gulab Deogade Vs the State of Maha. Thr… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:5225-DB

¶2

1 WP-2893-2024.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

Writ Petition No.2893 of 2024

¶5

[Mr. Amar S/o Gulab Deogade VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector,
Chandrapur and others]

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.

¶7

None for the Petitioner.

¶8

Shri S.M. Ukey, Additional Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.

¶9

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 2nd MAY, 2024

¶10

1. None for the petitioner.

¶11

2.We have heard Shri S.M. Ukey, learned Additional Government Pleader
for the respondent Nos.1 to 4.

¶12

3. The petitioner claims to be the Project Affected Person holding a certificate dated 30-12-2017 to that effect. The petitioner has made various representations to the respondents for grant of employment from the said category of Project Affected Person, which are informed to be not decided till this date.

¶13

4.In the aforesaid factual matrix, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this
petition with a direction to the petitioner to appear before the respondent Nos.5
and 6 with his prayer for grant of appointment as a Project Affected Person. The
said prayer be decided in accordance with law within a reasonable period of six

¶14

2 WP-2893-2024.odt

¶15

weeks from the date of appearance of the petitioner before the respondent Nos.5

¶16

and 6.

¶17

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)

¶18

 (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶19

LANJEWAR

Mr. Amar S/O Gulab Deogade v. the State of Maha. Thr. Collector, Chandrapur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Amar S/O Gulab Deogade v. the State of Maha. Thr. Collector, Chandrapur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Siddheshwar Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, Ukali Sukali, Thr. Pres., Dnyaneshwar D. Savant and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary, Education and Sports Dept., Mumbai and Others

Maroti S/O Rama Atram and Others Vs State of Maha. Thr. the Collector, Yavatmal and Others

Manish Kumar S/O M.L. Nayak Vs Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Bhusawal and Others

Sandeep Ambadas Kumre Vs the Minister for Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Ravindra Tukaramji Borkar Vs the Vice-Chancellor of Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Wardha

M/S. Green Park Flat Owners, Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. Thr. Secretary Vs City Survey Officer No. 3, Administrative Building No. 1, Nagpur and Another