Petitioner sought furlough/parole; authorities agreed to reconsider his request in light of a decision on Rule 4(10). Court directed authorities to take a decision within ten days and communicate it to the petitioner, disposing of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 906 wp 2879 of 2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2879 OF 2024
Sanjay Shivaji Limbole
…. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …. Respondents
Mr.Prosper D’souza, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Dr.Ashvini A. Takalkar, APP for Respondent – State.
B.M. Tadavi, Jailor Gr.-II, Yerwada Central Prison, Pune, present.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : 2rd AUGUST 2024.
P.C. :
1 In compliance of the order dated 29th July, 2024, the learned APP Dr.Takalkar has received instructions from the DIG Prisons on 31st July, 2024, stating that in the light of the decision of the High Court revolving around Section 4(10) of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, the Authorities would reconsider his request.
Digitally signed by RAJESHRI RAJESHRI PRAKASH PRAKASH AHER AHER Date: 2024.08.06 12:44:46 +0530
2 We have accepted the statement made in the communication addressed to the learned APP but since it do not specify the timing, we direct the concerned Authorities to take a decision within a period of 10 days from today and the decision shall be communicated to the Petitioner.
Rajeshri Aher
2/2 906 wp 2879 of 2024.doc
Writ Petition stands disposed off.
(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.)
(BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Rajeshri Aher
1 issue framed by the court
Whether authorities must decide the petitioner's furlough/parole request in light of Section 4(10) of the Prisons Rules, within a fixed time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Shivaji Limbole
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
Manjusha Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
