Anil Ramdas Bhawar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order (paucity of time) by Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court dated 21.11.2024 in W.P. 14590/2019, Machhindra Mahadeo Wanve v. State of Maharashtra, covering a batch of writ petitions (2007-2024) and F.C.A. Nos. 9/2019, 30/2024, 47/2024, 10/2008; next dates 22.01.2025 to 28.01.2025; several matters in urgent category. Key practical point for advocates: interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, continues till next date. Common State counsel: V. M. Kagane, A. S. Shinde, S. S. Dande, S. P. Joshi, P. S. Patil, A. S. Mantri, M. N. Ghanekar, K. K. Naik (A.G.P./Addl.G.P.); Petitioners' counsel: Sayyed Tausif Yasin. Contains no ruling on merits, no statute or precedent cited; citable only for continuity of interim protection across the listed hearing dates.
What did the court decide?
Matters adjourned to scheduled dates in January 2025; continuation of existing interim relief/undertaking/statement till next date. No merits adjudicated.