Counsel for the petitioners sought discharge after intimating the petitioners of the final hearing by post. No other advocate appeared for the petitioners, so discharge was granted and the writ petition was dismissed in default.
Advocate discharged; writ petition dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by VARSHA VARSHA VIJAY VIJAY RAJGURU RAJGURU Date: 2024.03.30 15:35:04 +0530
8-wp-2723-1999.doc
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2723 OF 1999
Smt. Namabai Laxu Nikam and Ors … Petitioners
vs.
Smt. Pushpa Subrao Mohite and Ors … Respondents
Mr. Gaurav Jaini/b. Mr. Kishor Tembe, for Petitioners.
Ms. Devashri G. Karandikar i/b. Mr. Saurabh M. Railkar, for Respondent No.1.
Mrs. S.S. Bhende, AGP for the State.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 28th MARCH, 2024
P.C. :-
Page no. 1 of 2
8-wp-2723-1999.doc
intimated to the petitioners that the writ petition is listed for final hearing and they should engage another advocate as he will be seeking discharge. Alongwith the application for discharge, the learned advocate has annexed copies of postal receipts, letter dated 1st February 2024 issued to the petitioners and postal tracking report to show that the letter is served upon the petitioners.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 2 of 2
Smt. Namabai Laxu Nikam and Ors
Smt. Pushpa Subrao Mohite and Ors
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
