Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a criminal writ petition with liberty to file a fresh application; the High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn with such liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1- 9.WP.259.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 259 OF 202 4
Mukesh S/o. Tarachand Gandhi
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra, through the Senior Police Inspector, Ajni Police Station, Nagpur
********************************************************************************************** Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
********************************************************************************************** Mr. A.S. Samdekar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Harshal Futane, APP for the Respondent.
CORAM : G. A. SANAP, J. DATED : 18th SEPTEMBER, 2024.
. Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh application.
Vijay
Signed by: Mr. Vijay Kumar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 19/09/2024 14:28:06
Mukesh S/o. Tarachand Gandhi
The State of Maharashtra, through the Senior Police Inspector, Ajni Police Station, Nagpur
G. A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
