Disposed

Gopal S/O Bhaurao Shelar v. the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others

Bombay HC2 May 2024WP/2527/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disqualification of a Sarpanch under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act was sought on the ground that he resided in his father's house built on encroached Government land. The Collector and Additional Commissioner found him disqualified despite an undisputed rent agreement showing separate residence. Holding that finding perverse for ignoring documentary evidence filed by the petitioner, the Court set aside both orders and directed the Collector to decide the disqualification application afresh.

What the court decided

AI extract

Gopal S/O Bhaurao Shelar vs the Additional… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

8-wp-2527-24.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2527 OF 2024

¶3

Gopal B. Shelar ...Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The Additional Commissioner,

¶6

Amravati Division,Amravati

¶7

The Collector, Buldhana

¶8

Gat Gram Panchayat Tarwadi

¶9

Dhammapal P. Tayade ...Respondents

¶10

Mr. R.D. Karode for the Petitioner. Mr. Sagar Ashirgade, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. H.V. Dhage for Respondent No.4.

¶11

CORAM : N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 18 JUNE 2024.

¶12

PC:-

¶13

This petition takes exception to the order dated 19.3.2024 passed by the respondent No.1 - Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati in Appeal No.116 /BVP-16(2) / Tarwadi / Buldhana /2023.

¶14

The petitioner herein was elected as a Member of Gat Gram Panchayat, Tarwadi. and thereafter as Sarpanch.

¶15

Respondent No.4 herein had filed an application before the respondent No.2 - Collector alleging that the father of the petitioner has encroached upon the Government land and

1/3

Dinesh S. Sherla

8-wp-2527-24.doc

constructed the house. It is alleged that the petitioner is residing in the said house with his father and thus, the petitioner be disqualified from continuing as Member/Sarpanch of Gat Gram Panchayat, Tarwadi, in view of Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act.

¶20

The respondent No.2 - Collector by order dated 29.11.2023 has allowed the said application. By the order impugned, respondent No.1 - Additional Commissioner has dismissed the appeal filed by the present petitioner against the order of respondent No.2 - Collector.

¶21

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned counsel for contesting respondent No.4.

¶22

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not residing with his father. It is submitted that the petitioner is residing separately with his family in the rented premises owned by one Gajanan L. Shelar. It is submitted that a specific plea was taken to that effect before the respondent

2/3

Dinesh S. Sherla

8-wp-2527-24.doc

No.2 – Collector and rent agreement was also filed in support of it. It is submitted that inspite of it, the respondent No.2 – Collector has recorded the finding that the petitioner has not filed any documentary evidence to show that he is residing separately from his father.

¶27

The fact of filing of rent agreement is not disputed. Therefore, the finding recorded by respondent No.2 – Collector that the petitioner has not filed any documentary evidence to show that he is residing separately appears to be perverse. In that view of the matter, the orders impugned cannot be allowed to stand and the matter will have to be remanded back to respondent No.2 for deciding it afresh. In the result, the following order is passed.

¶28

ORDER

¶29

A] The orders impugned are set aside. The respondent No.2 - Collector shall decide the application filed by respondent No.4 afresh in accordance with law. B] The Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶30

Dinesh S. Sherla

¶31

3/3

¶32

Signed by: DINESH SHERLA Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 21/06/2024 17:34:21

Gopal S/O Bhaurao Shelar v. the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Gopal S/O Bhaurao Shelar v. the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shrikrushna Madhukar Dharme and Another vs Manohar Aditmal Kruplani

Akola,Amravati,Buldhana,Washim Zilla Jangal Kamgar Sah. Sansthan Cha Sangh Marya.,Thr.Pres. and Anr. vs Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Amravati and Another

Mahesh Devendra Jadhao vs the Joint Charity Commissioner, Amravati Region, Amravati and Others

Ashok S/O Jagatnarayan Pande vs Kailash S/O Jagatnarayan Pande and Others

Ramkorbai @ Ramkunwarbai W/O Sheshrao Rathod vs Shashikalabai Sakharam Khillare

Mahesh Devendra Jadhao vs the Joint Charity Commissioner, Amravati Region, Amravati and Others