Kamaladevi Education Trust Throu. Its Chairman Sadanand Tirthraj Tiwari v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Bombay HC26 Feb 2024WP/2513/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Trust challenged refusal to grant final approval to start a three-year LL.B. course, contending the State applied Section 109(3)(g) though it only sought a Letter of Intent under Section 109(3)(d). The Court granted time to the State to file an additional affidavit clarifying its position and adjourned the matter.

What the court decided

AI extract

Kamaladevi Education Trust Throu. Its Chairman… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT

¶2

Digitally signed by SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT Date: 2024.11.18 18:51:46 +0530

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.2513 OF 2024

¶5

Kamaladevi Education Trust, Kalyan, Dist. Thane .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through Higher and Technical Education Department and Ors. .. Respondents

¶6

Mr. Jayendra D. Khairnar, Advocate for the Petitioner.

¶7

Mr. N.C. Walimbe, Additional Government Pleader with Mr. S.P. Kamble, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent-State of Maharashtra.

¶8

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ

¶9

DATE : 18^TH NOVEMBER 2024.

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

The petitioner – a Public Trust is aggrieved by the communication dated 29^th January 2024 issued by the Department of Higher and Technical Education by which it has refused to grant final approval on the application made by the petitioner for starting Three Years LL.B. Course. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No.8560 of 2023 (Kamaladevi Education Trust Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) with a prayer to decide its proposal dated 14^th January 2023 seeking grant of Letter of Intent for starting a Law College at Vitthalwadi, Taluka Kalyan, District Thane in academic year 2023-24. Pursuant thereto, by the order passed on 11^th July 2023, the Higher and Technical Education Department was directed to decide the said proposal. However as the proposal was not decided, the petitioner filed Contempt Petition No.37 of 2024. During

1/2

11-WP-2513-2024.doc

Dixit

pendency of the said proceedings, the proposal submitted by the petitioner came to be rejected on 29^th January 2024 stating therein that since Letter of Intent had not been granted, final approval for starting the said Law College could not be granted.

¶16

By relying upon the provisions of Section 109(3)(d) of the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, it is submitted that the petitioner merely seeks issuance of a Letter of Intent for starting Three Years LL.B. Course. However by relying upon the provisions of Section 109(3)(g), the final approval has been rejected. It is urged that by relying upon the inapplicable provisions of the Act of 2016, the Letter of Intent has been denied.

¶17

The learned Additional Government Pleader has referred to the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the Joint Director of Higher and Technical Education. He however seeks time to obtain necessary instructions in the light of rejection of the proposal by relying upon Section 109(3)(g) of the Act of 2016. Time is granted to file additional affidavit clarifying the aforesaid.

¶18

Put up for further consideration on 28^th November 2024.

¶19

2/2

¶20

11-WP-2513-2024.doc Dixit

Kamaladevi Education Trust Throu. Its Chairman Sadanand Tirthraj Tiwari v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Kamaladevi Education Trust Throu. Its Chairman Sadanand Tirthraj Tiwari v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

The Maharashtra State Co-Operative Bank Ltd. through Its Managing Director, vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Swami Samarth Sahakari Sakhar Kharkhana Ltd. vs the State of Maharashrashtra Throu. Principal Secretary of Dept of Co-Operation and Ors.

Bhagwan Dagadu Yadav Since Deceased Throu. His Legal Heir Vijay Bhagwan Yadav vs District Collector Satara and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary Agriculture Department Mantralaya Mumbai vs Mr Sachin Ramdas Sonawane

Apoorva Rajesh Kamble vs State of Maharashtra and 10 Ors.

Shridhar P. Prabhu vs Sandeep Sangve the Deputy Director of Education Mumbai Region