Vishnu Ganpat Kharat and Another v. State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court Bench at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition concerning disputed mutation entries and a fictitious NA order. Following the initiation of suo moto revision proceedings under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, the Court directed the respondent to serve stakeholders, grant hearing opportunities, and pass reasoned orders within specified timelines.
What did the court decide?
Directions to serve stakeholders, grant hearing opportunities, and pass reasoned orders on disputed mutation entries within specified timelines.