start educational school/institution is under the control and within the framework of the MEPS Act and the Circulars/GRs so issued from time to time. The reasons so recorded above, including the principle behind such "staffing pattern", though based upon the Schedule under the Act, in no way affect the rights of minority institutions to admit the students or charge the reasonable fee structure and to take action, if there is dereliction of duties on the part of any employee. Even the appointment of staff, teaching and non-teaching, are within the power of minority institutions, however there is no issue that the teaching and/or non-teaching staff, qualification and the related contentions are as per the provisions, Rules and Regulations and the Circulars/GRs so issued by the State for the minority institutions, if getting the aid from the State, to contend that this "staffing pattern" and the Circulars/GRs so issued for the same, are not applicable to them, in our view, is unacceptable situation. It is the obligation of the State to have a uniformity in every aspect of education providing uniform education pattern and qualification of teachers and/or staff. For uniformity, the standard of education and the staffing pattern so adopted by the State, though based upon the RTE Act and MEPS Act, just cannot be overlooked while regulating such minority institutions. This in no way takes away their rights, even to appoint the head of minority institutions. The provisions are also made and so also the statement that, the surplus teachers and the Head-masters of