Petitioner sought appointment-related relief from the municipal corporation; with an appointment letter now issued and placed on record, counsel withdrew the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:1224
1
2248.05WP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
905 WRIT PETITION NO.2248 OF 2005
RAJENDRA PANDURANG PATIL VERSUS
THE COMMISSIONER , DHULE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DHULE & ANOTHER
Advocate for the petitioner : Adv.R.C.Bora h/f. Adv.N.L.Chaudhari
AGP for Respondents: Mr.V.M.Chate Advocate for Respondent no. : Adv.S.P.Shah h/f. Adv.P.S.Shendurnikar
CORAM :ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE :18.01.2024
P.C. :
1]The learned counsel for the petitioner has
placed on record appointment letter and submits that the
present petition is rendered infructuous in view of the
appointment letter. The learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.
2]The appointment letter is taken on record and
marked ‘X’ for identification.
3]The present Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER]
JUDGE
DDC
Rajendra Pandurang Patil
The Commissioner, Dhule Municipal Corporation, Dhule
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court