The applicant filed the MCA alleging settlement of the dispute. The court observed that the MCA had become infructuous due to the settlement and dismissed the application.
Leave granted; MCA dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:1204
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
938 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 79 OF 2020
Shilpa Umakant Sapkale
….Applicant VERSUS
Umakant Prakash Sapkale
…..Respondent
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Patil Vinod Prakash
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : January 17, 2024
PER COURT :-
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
ssc/
Shilpa Umakant Sapkale
Umakant Prakash Sapkale
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
