Petitioners sought resolution of an inter-se seniority dispute in a private school. Relying on Rule 12(3) of the MEPS Rules, the court directed the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad Nashik, to decide the dispute regarding the management's seniority list within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
908-WP-2073-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2073 OF 2024
Ramrao Atmarao Bachhav And Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Education Officer, Secondary Zilla Parishad, Nashik And Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Yatin Malvankar, for the Petitioners. Mr. J. P. Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 – State. Mr.Sachin Gite, for respondent No.3.
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 25th JULY, 2024
P.C.:
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date: 2024.07.25 19:00:14 +0530
1 of 2
Sajakali Jamadar
908-WP-2073-2024.doc
of the dispute of seniority by the Education Officer. Learned A.G.P. for the respondent Nos.1 & 2 - State, also is agreeable for the same.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
2 of 2
Sajakali Jamadar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Education Officer has jurisdiction under Rule 12(3) MEPs Rules to decide disputes over the seniority list maintained by the school management.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramrao Atmarao Bachhav And Ors.
Education Officer, Secondary Zilla Parishad, Nashik
State of Maharashtra (Respondent No.2)
Respondent No.3 (Management)
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
