The writ petitioner's petition was declared infructuous and disposed of as the underlying suit before the Trial Court was dismissed during the pendency of these proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43.wp.2004.24.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2004 OF 2024
Sharad Machhindranath Patil..Petitioner
Versus
Maharashtra Industrial Development
Corporation (MIDC)..Respondent
Mr. Vinod P. Sangvikar, Advocate for Petitioner.Mr. Prashant Chawan a/w. Ms. Kinjal Jain and Mr. Hemal i/by Navdeep Vora & Associates for the Respondent.CORAM:MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE:MARCH 07, 2024.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Sangvikar, learned Advocate for Petitioner and
Mr. Chawan, learned Advocate for Respondent.
2. Mr. Chawan informs the Court that the Suit before the
learned Trial Court has been dismissed in the interregnum. He places
the order dated 27.02.2024 passed in Application below Exhibit “27”
in RCS No.235 of 2023 which is taken on record and marked “X” for
identification.
3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition has become
infructuous.
4. Writ Petition is disposed.
Ajay
Digitally signed by AJAY AJAY TRAMBAK TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE UGALMUGALE Date: 2024.03.07 19:25:36 +0530
1 of 1
Sharad Machhindranath Patil
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC)
Milind N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court