The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking a foreign scholarship. The court held that serious disputed questions of fact precluded interference and noted it was frivolous to seek assistance for a course already completed and paid for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE
Digitally signed by LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2024.08.16 20:49:10 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 1888 OF 2024
Aarya Jaysinha Pawar
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Adv. Niranjan Bhavake i/b Chaitali Pachpute for the Petitioner.
Adv. Rajesh Tekale for the Respondent No.4.
Ms. S. S. Bhende , AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 14, 2024
P. C.
Page 1 of 3 AUGUST 14, 2024
Laxmi
Standard and 65.23% marks in 12th Standard. After this, the Petitioner secured an admission in Fergusson College for B.Sc Zoology and passed with first class and distinction in 2018. The Petitioner claims to be a scholar student in her field and a well behaved student in life.
Page 2 of 3 AUGUST 14, 2024
Laxmi
rejoinder filed by the Petitioner stating how the marks are incorrectly calculated.
[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
Page 3 of 3 AUGUST 14, 2024
Laxmi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition challenging the calculation of marks and ranking for a foreign scholarship where the course has already been completed and paid for?
Aarya Jaysinha Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Colabawalla
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
