Arjun Vitthal Chavan v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listed for filing affidavit in reply by Respondent No. 3. No substantive decision recorded.
What the court decided
34.WP18829.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 18829 OF 2024
Arjun Vitthal Chavan. … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents.
Mr. Ashwin R. Kapadnis, h/f. Balaji Shinde, for the Petitioner. Mr. Ashok Misal, for Respondent No. 3.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE : 17th DECEMBER, 2024
P.C. :
- The learned Advocate representing the Zilla Parishad, Solapur, Respondent No. 3, submits that there is no vacancy as on date in the category in which the Petitioner can be accommodated. He desires to
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arjun Vitthal Chavan
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Zilla Parishad, Solapur
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shama Parveen Abdul Bashir vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Trhough the Municipal Commissioner
Coast Guard Employees Union a Trade Union Registered vs Union of India through the Secretary to the Ministry of Defence
Shamshuddin Umarali Mushrif vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Ors.
Narayan Pundalik Pathade vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through Its Commissioner