Petitioners filed a writ petition which became infructuous as proceedings before the lower appellate court were disposed of; consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
988-WP-1880-2024.odt
2024:BHC-AUG:27251
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1880 OF 2024
Ramchandra Chokhaji Khandare Deceased Through Lrs
Sanjay Ramchandra Khandare And Others
VERSUS
Prakash Gangaram Khandare Since Deceased And Others
Mr. A. P. Bhandari, Advocate for the PetitionersMr. S. R. Bagal, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2, 8 and 9Mr. G. K. Naik Thigle, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5 & 6CORAM:R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE:NOVEMBER 19, 2024
PER COURT :
1.Learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on
instructions, makes statement that Petition has become
infructuous as proceedings before the Lower Appellate
Court are disposed of.
2.In view of above, Petition stands disposed of
as infructuous.
PAGE 1 OF 1
Umesh
Ramchandra Chokhaji Khandare
Sanjay Ramchandra Khandare
Prakash Gangaram Khandare
R.M. JOSHI, J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court