Petitions under various Writ Petition numbers were filed. The Court was informed that the underlying suit from which these petitions arose has been disposed of. Consequently, the Court held that nothing survives in the petitions.
Petitions stand dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:27204
902-WP-1469-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1469 OF 2024
Vijay Uttam Prasad Naik And Another
VERSUS
Chhaya Rajendra Prashad Naik And Others
...
Mr. A. R. Vaidya, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. M. R. Sonawane, Advocate for Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 13305 OF 2023
Vijay Uttam Prashad Naik And Another
VERSUS
Chhaya Rajendra Prashad Naik And Others
Mr. A. R. Vaidya, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. D. P. Palodkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 10
Mr. M. R. Sonawane, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4, 5,
12 and 15
CORAM:R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE:NOVEMBER 19, 2024
PER COURT :
1.This Court is informed that the suit from
which the present Petitions have arisen is disposed of.
As such, nothing survives in the Petitions.
2.Petitions stand dismissed as infructuous.
PAGE 1 OF 1
Umesh
Vijay Uttam Prasad Naik
And Another
Chhaya Rajendra Prashad Naik
And Others
R.M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court