Criminal writ petition challenging rejection of the petitioner's application to recall PWs 1 to 7 for further cross-examination, contending prior cross-examination was conducted negligently by counsel. Court heard counsel, APP waived notice for the State, and adjourned the matter after two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2 Cr.WP-179-2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.179 OF 2024
[Harshwardhan Raibhan Jadhav ..Vs.. The State of Maharashtra]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Mr A. I. Nayak, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr H. D. Dubey, APP for Respondent/State.
CORAM : M. W. CHANDWANI, J. DATE : 2 nd APRIL, 2024 .
and others, 2018 SCC OnLine Bom 10150 as well as Jamaluddin Mohd. Shaban Ansari vs State of Maharashtra, 2018 SCC OnLine Bom 10155 .
TAMBE
2 Cr.WP-179-2024
2
(JUDGE)
Signed by: Mr. Ashish Tambe Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 03/04/2024 10:55:44 TAMBE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether witnesses in Sessions Case No.803 of 2021 can be recalled for further cross-examination after counsel's allegedly casual conduct.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hindustan Antibiotics and another vs State of Maharashtra and othersRelied on¶2
2018 SCC OnLine Bom 10150 · Who else cites this
Jamaluddin Mohd. Shaban Ansari vs State of MaharashtraRelied on¶2
2018 SCC OnLine Bom 10155 · Who else cites this
Harshwardhan Raibhan Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
M. W. Chandwani
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
