Disposed

Shri. Manohar Govindra Vyavhare and Others v. Laxman Mahadeo Vadki and Others

Bombay HC25 Jun 2024WP/1780/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged the District Court's rejection of their appeal against an interim injunction in a title suit filed by respondents. The court, noting the injunction had operated for a year without any interim relief to petitioners, declined to entertain the petition and directed expeditious trial of the suit.

What did the court decide?

Trial court directed to decide Regular Civil Suit No. 184 of 2022 within one year; petition disposed of with pending applications.

Shri. Manohar Govindra Vyavhare and Others vs Laxman… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:6731

¶2

926-cwp-1780-24.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1780 OF 2024

¶4

Manohar G. Vyavhare

¶5

Dasrath T. Kale

¶6

Ramabai P. Milmile

¶7

lata G. Aawari

¶8

Gajanan M. Awari

¶9

Ganpat M. Awari

¶10

Madhukar K. Kadak 8. Ganesh R. Kale

¶11

Mahesh R. Kale 10. Sanjay K. Barde ...Petitioners Versus

¶12

Laxman M. Vadki

¶13

Manohar L. Vadki 3. Vijay L. Vadki 4. Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar Saoner, Dist. Nagpur. ...Respondents

¶14

Mr. Rohan R. Deo for the Petitioners. Mr. V.B. Palorkar for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Ms Mrunal Naik, AGP for the Respondent/ State.

¶15

CORAM : N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 25 JUNE 2024.

¶16

PC:-

¶17

This petition takes exception to the order dated 24.11.2023 passed by the District Judge, Nagpur in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 110 of 2022.

¶18

In a suit filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein for declaration and injunction against the petitioners, the trial Court by order dated 21.06.2023 granted interim injunction in

1/2

Dinesh S. Sherla

926-cwp-1780-24.doc

favour of the respondent Nos.1 to 3. The appeal filed by the petitioners against the order of trial Court came to be rejected by the order impugned.

¶23

Admittedly, there was no interim order in favour of the petitioners during pendency of the appeal and thus since last one year the interim injunction is operating against the present petitioners. In that view of matter instead of entertaining the present petition, it would be appropriate to direct the trial Court to decide the Suit expeditiously.

¶24

The trial Court shall endeavour to decide the suit being Regular Civil Suit No. 184 of 2022 as early as possible and in any case within a period of one year from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶25

The Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶26

Pending applications, if any, are disposed of.

¶27

Dinesh S. Sherla

¶28

2/2

¶29

Signed by: DINESH SHERLA Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 29/06/2024 16:36:27

Shri. Manohar Govindra Vyavhare and Others v. Laxman Mahadeo Vadki and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Manohar Govindra Vyavhare and Others v. Laxman Mahadeo Vadki and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Suresh Shamrao Thote and Others Vs Sub Divisinal Officer, Umred, Nagpur and Others

Bhartiya Seva Acharya Education Society, Thr. Its Sec. Nagpur and Another Vs Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Nagpur and Others

Parker Hannifin Corp. Parker Hannifin India Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur Thr. Unit Head, V.V. Ghodvaidya vs Roshankumar Rameshrao Rokade

Akola,Amravati,Buldhana,Washim Zilla Jangal Kamgar Sah. Sansthan Cha Sangh Marya.,Thr.Pres. and Anr. vs Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Amravati and Another

Ayodhyaprasad Arjunlal Jaiswal vs Sujata Hemantsingh Bais and Others

Karan Hariram Solanke vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept., Mumbai and Another