Petitioners sought to convert an RTS revision into an appeal. The court allowed conversion and directed the Additional Collector to decide the appeal on merits without being influenced by the impugned order's observations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15-wp1760-2024.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1760 OF 2024
VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV
Digitally signed byVAIBHAV RAMESHJADHAVDate: 2024.02.1217:14:09 +0530
Janglya Shanvar Khanjode Since Deceased Through Legal Heirs and Representatives & Ors. … Petitioners
V/s. The Additional Collector, Mumbai Suburban District & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Pradeep J. Thorat with Mr. Suryajeet Prithviraj Chavan for the petitioners.
Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar with Mr. Amogh Singh, Mr. Sanosth Pathak, Ms. Supriya Pathak, Mr. Chirag Thakkar & Mr. Kailash Pathak i/by Law Origin for respondent No.6.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 12, 2024
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the RTS Revision could be permitted to be converted into an appeal before the Additional Collector.
Janglya Shanvar Khanjode Since Deceased Through Legal Heirs and Representatives & Ors.
The Additional Collector, Mumbai Suburban District
Respondent No.6
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
