Writ petition against a Part-I Award upholding the fairness of a domestic inquiry; during pendency, the underlying reference was decided. Petition dismissed with liberty to challenge the Part-I Award along with the main judgment.
Liberty granted to petitioner to challenge the Part-I Award along with the main judgment; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
212-wp90-2004.doc
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.90 OF 2004
ATUL GANESH KULKARNI
Digitally signed byATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2024.02.09 17:19:33 +0530
Chandankumar Jena… Petitioner
V/s.
Engineering Equipment Fabricators… Respondent
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Abhishek T. Ingale with Mr. T.R. Yadav and Mr.
Pradeep Kumar i/by C.R. Naidu & Co. for the
respondent.
CORAM:AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:FEBRUARY 9, 2024
P.C.:
1.The writ petition arises out of Part-I Award for holding
inquiry to be fair and proper. However, during the pendency of
the writ petition, the reference is decided.
2.Hence, by granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge Part-
I Award along with main judgment, the writ petition is dismissed.
No costs.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Chandankumar Jena
Engineering Equipment Fabricators
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court