M I Alloys v. Income Tax OFFICER-30-1-1, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment only. The Bombay High Court stood the writ petition over to 12/11/2024 for want of time; interim relief, if any, earlier granted was continued till the next date. No substantive issue decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1748 OF 2024
M I Alloys ....PETITIONER
V/S
Income Tax Officer-30-1-1, Mumbai
....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA, JJ DATE : 8th October, 2024 P.C. :
Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 12/11/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date.
( ASSOCIATE )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M I Alloys
- respondent
Income Tax Officer-30-1-1, Mumbai
Coram
G. S. Kulkarni
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Kotak Securities Limited through Its Authorized Representative Sandeep Gupta vs National Stock Exchange of India Limited
Genu Mahadu Jadhav Decd Thru Lrs vs the Government of India and Ors.
Ananda Revji Sanap vs Competent Authority and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Nashik and Ors.
Man Industries India Limited vs Securities and Exchange Board of India