Disposed

Tech-Connect Retail Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner, Gst, Division-Vi, Mumbai Central Commissionerate

Bombay HC11 Oct 2024WP/1747/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged a GST assessment order dated 13 December 2022. The High Court declined to entertain the petition, relegating it to the statutory appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), with directions for expeditious disposal if filed within three weeks, leaving all contentions open.

What the court decided

AI extract

Tech-Connect Retail Private Limited vs Assistant… — GST and Indirect Tax | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

6-WP-1747-2024.DOCX

¶2

2024:BHC-OS:16094

¶3

Darshan Patil

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 1747 OF 2024

¶6

M/s Tech-Connect Retail Private Ltd. …Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner, GST, Division VI …Respondent ______________________________________________________

¶7

Mr Rohan Shah, Senior Advocate , a/w Mr Supreme Kothari, Ms Surabhi Prabhudesai, Mr Chayank Bhora, Mr Chirag Shetty i/b Economic Laws Practice, for the Petitioner. Adv M P Shrma , a/w Adv Mamta Omle, for the Respondent.

¶8

CORAM M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATED: 11 October 2024

¶9

PC:-

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

The petitioner challenges the order dated 13 December 2022 made by the Assistant Commissioner of GST, Division VI, Mumbai Central GST.

¶12

Against the above order, the petitioner has a remedy of appeal before the Commissioner GST. Accordingly, we are not inclined to entertain this petition but relegate the petitioner to the alternate remedy of the appeal available under CGST.

¶13

Mr Rohan Shah, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the appeal would be

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

6-WP-1747-2024.DOCX

¶16

instituted within 3 weeks from today. If such an appeal is instituted within 3 weeks from today considering the fact that this petition was filed within 4 months from the date of the impugned order, we direct the appellate authority to dispose of that appeal on its own merits and in accordance with law. However, we clarify that all contentions of all parties are explicitly left open to be decided by the Commissioner (Appeal) in the first instance.

¶17

This petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms without any orders for costs.

¶18

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶19

(Jitendra Jain, J)

¶20

(M.S. Sonak, J)

¶21

Signed by: Darshan Patil Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 11/10/2024 18:48:47

¶22

Page 2 of 2

Tech-Connect Retail Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner, Gst, Division-Vi, Mumbai Central Commissionerate

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Tech-Connect Retail Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner, Gst, Division-Vi, Mumbai Central Commissionerate

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

B.V. Jewels vs Union of India through the Secretary and 4 Ors.

Ebay Singapore Services Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax International TAXATION-CIRCLE-2-2-1

Shri. Pandurang Yashwant Virkar and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Merck Life Science Private limited vs Union of India

Smritee Enterprises Thr. Its Proprietor Poonam Ronak Shah vs Union of India Represented by the Secretary, Department Revenue, Ministry of Finance and Ors.

Pandurang Balu Pujare and Anr. vs the Competent Authority and Sub Divisional Officer and Ors.