Writ petition sought quashing of FIR registered at Mulund Police Station. The Additional PP stated on instructions that investigation concluded with a decision to file a 'C Summary Report' within one week. The statement was accepted and the petition was disposed as not surviving.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Talwalkar 9.WP.1678.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1678 OF 2024
Satishchand Anand. …..Petitioner
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr..
…..Respondents
Mr. Abad Ponda, Vikrant Singh Negi, Ekta Tyagi, Pratik Thakkar, Sneha Barange, Vishal Hegde, i/b. DSK Legal, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Smt. Anamika Malhotra, Addl. P.P., for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Ravindra Dalavi, ACP, Mulund Division.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 9th AUGUST, 2024.
P.C.:-
submitted that, after investigation of the present crime, the Police have come to the conclusion that 'C Summary Report' is to be filed before the Court of competent jurisdiction. That the said report will be filed within a period of one week from today. The said statement is accepted.
registered with Mulund Police Station, Mumbai does not survive and is accordingly disposed off.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Digitally signed by ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date: 2024.08.14 18:10:55 +0530
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing C.R. No. 182 of 2024 survives when the State states a 'C Summary Report' will be filed after investigation.
Satishchand Anand
The State Of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
