Disposed

Prajwal S/O Pralhad Mangare v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary Department of Sports and Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC3 May 2024WP/1597/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court permitted the grant of compassionate appointment to the petitioner, holding that the management can make an exception to the restraint order issued by the Assistant Charity Commissioner. The court directed the management to intimate the Charity Commissioner's office regarding the appointment.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to make an exception to the restraint order and grant compassionate appointment to the petitioner.

Prajwal S/O Pralhad Mangare Vs State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 wp1597.24

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 1597 OF 2024

¶4

( Prajwal s/o Pralhad Mangare ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Mumbai and others )

¶5

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

Court's or Judge's orders

¶8

¶9

Mr. N.S. Warulkar, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S.M. Ghodeswar, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2, Mr. U.V. Chakravarti, Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4

¶10

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, J J . DATED : 03-05-2024

¶11

The only impediment shown to us in the matter of grant of compassionate appointment to the petitioner is the restraint order passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Bhandara on 26-10-2018 in the proceedings taken out under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act in Application No.5/2018. The operative part of the said order reads thus ;

¶12

“1) The Application No.05/2018 is hereby partly allowed.

¶13

The Recorded trustees are hereby directed to run the day to day affairs of this trust by majority decision and they are further directed not to take any policy decision.

¶14

Both the parties are hereby directed to proceed the Change Report Inquiry No.72/2018 and Scheme Application No.20/2018 expeditiously without delaying the matters.

¶15

1. No order as to costs.

¶16

1. Dictated and pronounced in open Court.”

¶17

2 wp1597.24

¶18

It is the fact about the petitioner being in the employment of the respondent-management since last about an year is not disputed.

¶19

In the aforesaid background, since the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment is based on the policy of the Government, the respondentmanagement, in our opinion, can make an exception to the order dated 26-10-2018. However, the respondentmanagement shall make an intimation to the office of the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Bhandara about granting compassionate appointment to the petitioner.

¶20

With above observations, the petition stands disposed of.

¶21

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶22

adgokar

Prajwal S/O Pralhad Mangare v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary Department of Sports and Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prajwal S/O Pralhad Mangare v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary Department of Sports and Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravindra Tukaramji Borkar Vs the Vice-Chancellor of Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Wardha

M/S. Green Park Flat Owners, Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. Thr. Secretary Vs City Survey Officer No. 3, Administrative Building No. 1, Nagpur and Another

Mr. Amar S/O Gulab Deogade Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Collector, Chandrapur and Others

Waqf Institution Madina Masjid Wardha Thr. Its Trustees/President, Mr. Mohammed S. Wakil Shah Vs the Maha. State Waqf Board Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer, Aurangabad and Others

Jijau Mahila Vikas Sansadhan Sanstha, Thr. President, Shegaon and Others Vs Education Officer (Primary), Z.P. Buldhana

Aditya S/O Rajue Donade Vs the State of Maha., Thr. Department of Rural Urban Development, Mumbai and Ors.