The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-WP.15698.2023
Jvs.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 15698 OF 2023
Christy Friedgram Industry } Petitioner versus The Commissioner, Integrated } Child Development Services } & Anr. } Respondents
Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar for the petitioner.
Ms. Prachi Tatke, Special Counsel with Mr.P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader and Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Additional Government Pleader for State.
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE: 19th JANUARY 2024
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Narvankar, learned counsel for the petitioner. He has stated that after filing of the writ petition, the petitioner has been apprised of the reasons for rejection of the petitioner’s technical bid which has necessitated the petitioner to challenge the said decision afresh.
2. In the aforesaid background, leave has been sought by the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
3. In the aforesaid circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE
Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATHSALUNKE Date: 2024.01.19 17:47:42 +0530
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Christy Friedgram Industry
The Commissioner, Integrated Child Development Services
Anr.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
