A writ petition concerning a tender was dismissed after counsel for Pune Municipal Corporation informed the court that the subject tender had been cancelled, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by LAXMIKANT LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2024.01.18 17:22:47 +0530
1 (33) WP-12933.23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.12933 OF 2023
M/s. Siddhivinayak Enterprises Through authorized person Mr. Vijay Vitthal Pimpre : Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and ors. : Respondents.
Mr. Ajinkya Udane for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP with Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl. GP and Ms. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Rajdeep Khadapkar for Respondent Nos. 3 to 7.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 18th JANUARY, 2024
P.C. :
Respondent - Pune Municipal Corporation, states that the tender
which is the subject matter of the instant Writ Petition itself has
been cancelled which has rendered the Writ Petition infructuous.
1 of 2
LGC
2 (33) WP-12933.23.doc
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 of 2
LGC
M/s. Siddhivinayak Enterprises Through authorized person Mr. Vijay Vitthal Pimpre
State of Maharashtra and ors.
Pune Municipal Corporation
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
