Shubhangi Ajitkumar Khopade v. the State of Maharashtra the. Gp and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A common listing order adjourning a large batch of matters that could not be heard for paucity of time, directing removal of office objections and continuation of interim orders.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
&
ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE :- 14TH NOVEMBER, 2024
Per Court :-
- The matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5
hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing, due to paucity of time.
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As
such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order,
Coram
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Coast Guard Employees Union a Trade Union Registered vs Union of India through the Secretary to the Ministry of Defence
Smt. S Uma Maheshwari vs Municipal Corporation of Gr Mumbai Thr Its Commissioner and Ors.
Mr. Hari Yashwant Athawale vs State Bank of India and Anr.
Pandharinath Dilip Kanojia and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary, School Edu. Dept. and Ors.