In a writ petition, the petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the filing. The court granted liberty and dismissed the writ petition ab initio as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-WP.15376.2023
Jvs.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 15376 OF 2023
Landmark Corporation Private Limited } Petitioner versus The Maharashtra Industrial } Development Corporation & Anr. } Respondents
Mr. Saurabh Kshirsagar i/b. Maniar Srivastava Associates for the petitioner.
Mr. Dr. Birendra Saraf, Advocate General with Mr. Akshay Karlekar i/b. Shreeyog Law Associates for respondents 1 and 2 (MIDC).
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE: 19th JANUARY 2024
P.C.:
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition. The prayer is not being opposed by the learned counsel representing the respondents.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE
Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATHSALUNKE Date: 2024.01.19 17:47:35 +0530
1
Landmark Corporation Private Limited
The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation & Anr.
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
