Nitin Ramesh Adsul v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenges an MPID court order permitting respondents 7 and 8 to purchase attached land for Rs.65 lakhs without auction. The High Court issued notice, waived notice for several respondents, stayed the impugned order and granted ad-interim relief restraining execution of conveyance till 6 May 2024.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order dated 30 January 2024 stayed; ad-interim restraint on Competent Authority executing conveyance in favour of respondents 7 and 8 until next date.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by RUSHIKESH RUSHIKESH VISHNU VISHNU PATIL PATIL Date: 2024.05.02 17:10:51 +0530
902 WP.1516.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1516 OF 2024
Nitin Ramesh Adsul …. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. V. M. Thorat a/w Mr. M. V. Thorat and Mr. Amar Bodke, for the Petitioner.
Mr. C. K. Pendse, for the Respondent No. 7.
Mr. P. D. Jadhav, for the Respondent No. 8.
Mr. K. V. Saste, Addl.P.P., for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Raysing Patil, P.I., EOW, Unit- 7, is present.
M. B. Dandekar, from office of the Competent Authority, is present.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Designated Court under the MPID Act could permit private sale of attached property without auction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nitin Ramesh Adsul
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Revati Mohite Dere
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court