Ajitkumar Prakash Pailwan v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/15147/2024
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
¶4
DATE :- 10th DECEMBER, 2024
¶5
Per Court :-
¶6
- At the time of rising at 6.00 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶7
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶8
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶9
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
¶10
before the next date.
¶11
- Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Coast Guard Employees Union a Trade Union Registered vs Union of India through the Secretary to the Ministry of Defence
Mr. Kishor Singh Yadav S/O Late Shri Ramdas Yadav vs Union of India Thru the Director General Rpf , Ministry of Railways and Anr.
Sangram Pandurang Tikode, vs the State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary and Ors.
Ravindra Tatoba Mote vs the Municipal Commissioner of Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai