Tanaji Babaso Kolekar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/15144/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Listing order: a batch of matters could not be heard for want of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks and interim orders to continue; matters listed for admission or final hearing on dates in February 2025.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
¶4
DATE :- 10th DECEMBER, 2024
¶5
Per Court :-
¶6
- At the time of rising at 6.00 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶7
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶8
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶9
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
¶10
before the next date.
¶11
- Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Manisha Nimesh Mehta vs Technology Development Board through Its Director
Sweety Suryakant Shinde vs Chief Secretary Minister of Home Dept and Ors.
Ashok Shankar Mandre and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra Throu. Sec. Urban Development Dept and Ors.
Yogita Pritam Shejale vs State of Maharashtra School Education and Sports Department