Writ petition over possession of property; petitioner submitted that possession had already been handed over to the respondents during the pendency of the petition, and the writ petition was disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2.wp.14663.2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14663 OF 2018
Sharad Digambar Badave …Petitioner V/s.
Smt. Sharda Gajanan Dingare And Anr. …Respondents
Amol Digitally signedby Amol Diliprao Nawale Diliprao Date: Nawale 2024.02.0317:22:50 +0530
Mr. Sarang Satish Aradhye a/w. Shantanu Gurav for Petitioner. None for Respondents.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 30 JANUARY 2024
P.C.:
instructions of his client submits that during the pendency of the
petition, the possession has already been handed over to the Respondents.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1
Amol D. Nawale
Sharad Digambar Badave
Smt. Sharda Gajanan Dingare
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
