The Yashodhara Mahila Sahakari Audyogik Utpadak Sanstha Maryadit , Nashik v. the Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development Dept. Thane and Ors.

Bombay HC16 Oct 2024WP/14373/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Five connected writ petitions concerning a cooperative society and the Tribal Development Department came up for notice. Affidavits-in-reply were on record; the petitions were adjourned to the next listing date with interim relief continuing in the meantime.

What did the court decide?

Interim relief granted earlier shall continue until the next date of listing.

The Yashodhara Mahila Sahakari Audyogik Utpadak… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

906-aswp14371-2024 & connected.doc

¶2

AGK

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

ATUL GANESH KULKARNI

¶5

Digitally signed by ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2024.12.20 15:35:12 +0530

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.14371 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.14380 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.14375 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.14373 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.14378 OF 2024

¶7

The Yashodhara Mahila Sahakari Audyogik Utpadak Sanstha Maryadit & Ors. … Petitioners V/s.

¶8

The Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development Department & Ors. … Respondents

¶9

Mr. Satyajeet P. Dighe with Mr. Abhijeet F. Khade for the petitioner in all the WPs.

¶10

Mr. O.A. Chandurkar, Additional G.P. with Mrs. G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 3- State.

¶11

Mr. Swapnil Ambure with Mr.Ajit Soni for respondent No.4 in WP/14371/2024 & 14378/2024.

¶12

CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ & AMIT BORKAR, J.

¶13

DATED : DECEMBER 20, 2024

¶14

¶15

906-aswp14371-2024 & connected.doc

¶16

P.C.:

¶17

Writ Petition No.14380 of 2024:

¶18

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 13 January 2025.

¶19

Learned Additional G.P. appears for respondent Nos.1 to 3 - State and waives service of notice.

¶20

We may note that in this writ petition, affidavit-in-reply has been filed by the State – respondent Nos.1 to 3, to which rejoinder-affidavit has also been filed by the petitioner.

¶21

Stand over to 13 January 2025 (high on board) .

¶22

Interim relief granted earlier shall continue to operate till the next date of listing.

¶23

Writ Petition No.14371 of 2024 & 14378 of 2024:

¶24

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 13 January 2025.

¶25

Learned Additional G.P. appears for respondent Nos.1 to 3 - State and waives service of notice; whereas Mr. Ambure puts in appearance on behalf of respondent No.4 and waives service of notice.

¶26

Respondent No.4 has filed affidavit-in-reply, to which rejoinder-affidavit has also been filed by the petitioner.

¶27

Learned Additional G.P. states that affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf the State – respondent Nos.1 to 3 in Writ Petition

¶28

¶29

906-aswp14371-2024 & connected.doc

¶30

No.14380 of 2024 may be treated as affidavit-in-reply in this writ petition as well. Rejoinder-affidavit, if any, may be filed by the petitioner before the next date of listing.

¶31

Stand over to 13 January 2025 (high on board) .

¶32

Interim relief granted earlier shall continue to operate till the next date of listing.

¶33

Writ Petition No.14373 of 2024 & 14375 of 2024:

¶34

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 13 January 2025.

¶35

Learned Additional G.P. appears for respondent Nos.1 to 3 - State and waives service of notice.

¶36

We provide that affidavit-in-reply filed by the State – respondent Nos.1 to 3 in Writ Petition No.14380 of 2024 shall be treated as affidavit-in-reply in this writ petition as well. Rejoinder-affidavit, if any, may be filed by the petitioner before the next date of listing.

¶37

Stand over to 13 January 2025 (high on board) .

¶38

Interim relief granted earlier shall continue to operate till the next date of listing.

¶39

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)

¶40

(CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶41

The Yashodhara Mahila Sahakari Audyogik Utpadak Sanstha Maryadit , Nashik v. the Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development Dept. Thane and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Yashodhara Mahila Sahakari Audyogik Utpadak Sanstha Maryadit , Nashik v. the Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development Dept. Thane and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ramadas Ks vs Tata Institute of Social Sciences

Haq Steels and Mataliks Limited through Its Authorised Signatory vs Adi Impex Infra Services

Suyash Suryakant Patil vs National Medical Commission Thr. Its Secretary and Ors.

Bank of Baroda vs State of Maharashtra

Reshma Babu Thikar vs University of Mumbai through Its Registrar

Sharan Shelters Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Bank of India through Asset Recovery Management Branch