Aruna Shivdas Vasakar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Secretary and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Administrative listing order: matters could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. Office objections to be removed within two weeks; existing interim orders to continue; affidavits to be filed; matters listed across January–February 2025.
What did the court decide?
Continuation of ad-interim/interim orders already granted, subject to removal of office objections within two weeks.
What the court decided
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE :- 2nd DECEMBER, 2024
Per Court :-
- At the time of rising at 6.00 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
before the next date.
- Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-
Coram
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Tushar Vasantrao Patil vs the State of Maha. Thr. Prin. Sec. Dept. of School Education and Ors.
Rohidas S/O Vitthal Botre and Ors. vs the State of Mahrashtra Thr Its Principal Secreary School Education and Ors.
Ganesh Mohan Jagtap and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra (through the Secretary, School Edu. Dept. ) and Ors.
Pramila Yashwant Khule vs the State of Maharashtra