Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd. v. Santosh Haribhau Gunjal
Case brief
What is this about?
Five writ petitions by Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd against employees were adjourned due to paucity of time; earlier interim relief, if any, continued till the next date.
What the court decided
Board Sr.No.:-28
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1401 OF 2024
Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd ....PETITIONER V/S
Sharad Gotpagar ....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1403 OF 2024
Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd ....PETITIONER V/S
Sachin Shivlang Gaikwad ....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1402 OF 2024
Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd ....PETITIONER V/S Santosh Haribhau Gunjal ....RESPONDENT
WITH
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd
- respondent
Sharad Gotpagar
- respondent
Sachin Shivlang Gaikwad
- respondent
Santosh Haribhau Gunjal
- respondent
Gautam Sakharam Nikam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court