Writ petition declared infructuous as the earlier committee's term had expired and a new election took place. Membership issues left for future adjudication.
Writ petition disposed of; management of future elections left for appropriate authority to decide.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:2927
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 WRIT PETITION NO. 13960 OF 2023
SHAIKH RASHID SHAIKH MAQDUM AND ANOTHER VERSUS
MOHD KHUDBODDIN MUNNAWAR SHARIFULLA KHAN NIZAMI AND ANOTHER
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Kadam Vikram S. Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. V. D. Gunale
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Dated : February 07, 2024
PER COURT :-
2 901 WP 13960-2023
vj gawade/-.
Sheikh Rashid Sheikh Maqum and Another
Mohd Khuddboddin Munnawar Sharifulla Khan Nizami and Another
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
