Civil applications seeking withdrawal of amounts deposited in court in a writ petition; registry reported the entire amount had already been withdrawn by petitioners, so the applications no longer survived and were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:3422
1
3354.22CA+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
980 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3354 OF 2022 IN WP/3451/2002 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 379 OF 2022 IN WP/3451/2002
THE MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHATANA
VERSUS
THE DIVISIONAL SEED CERTIFICATION OFFICER
Advocate for Applicant : Adv.D.G.Kamble Advocate for Respondent : Adv.U.S.Malte
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 06.02.2024
P.C. :
1] None present for the petitioners.
2] This Court, by order dated 02.01.2024, had directed the registry to submit a report whether amount is lying in this Court. The registry has submitted the report and report indicates that the entire amount deposited in this Court has been withdrawn by the concerned petitioners and no amount is lying in this Court.
3] In view of the same, the applications for withdrawal of amount do no survive. Both Civil Applications stand disposed of accordingly.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE
DDC
THE MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHATANA
THE DIVISIONAL SEED CERTIFICATION OFFICER
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
