The petitioners, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court permitted the withdrawal, vacated interim orders, and disposed of the petition without costs.
Petition withdrawn; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
528-WP-139-2024.DOC
Digitally signed by GANESH GANESH SUBHASH SUBHASH LOKHANDE LOKHANDE Date: 2024.11.29 16:16:11 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 139 OF 2024
Balasaheb Mahadev Kakde & Anr.
… Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Divyesh Jain, i/b. Nitin Gaware Patil, for the petitioners. Mr. S. B. Kalel, AGP, for the respondents-State.
_______________________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.
DATED: 26 NOVEMBER 2024
P.C.
(ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.)
(G. S. KULKARNI , J.)
Page 1 of 1 26 NOVEMBER 2024
Ganesh Lokhande, PA
Balasaheb Mahadev Kakde
The State of Maharashtra
G. S. Kulkarni
Advait M. Sethna
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
