Writ petition seeking action in a criminal complaint became infructuous after the accused were discharged when the complainant withdrew the complaint; the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chitra Sonawane. 1 16-wp-1386-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Cri.Writ Petition No.1386 of 2018
Narayan Shankar Tarwade ... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharahstra & Anr. … Respondents.
Mr Kushal Ambulkar i/by Pawan Mali for petitioner.
Mr Arfan Sait, APP for respondent.
Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 15 February 2024.
P.C. :
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
tendered a copy of the order passed by the laerned JMFC,
Cantonment Court, Pune, dated 28.09.2021 and submits that
the accused persons were already discharged as the complaint
was withdrawn by the complainant. He submits that in view
of this, nothing survives in this petition.
2.Given the above, the petition stands dismissed as
infructuous.
[R. N. Laddha, J.]
Narayan Shankar Tarwade
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court